Adverse Childhood Experiences: how childhood trauma shapes adult struggles

The study that changed the question

Between 1995 and 1997, researchers with the CDC and Kaiser Permanente conducted one of the largest investigations ever conducted into childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and how they connect to health and well-being decades later. By the time the findings were published in 1998, roughly 17,337 adults enrolled in Kaiser Permanente's San Diego HMO had been surveyed — a massive, methodologically serious sample, not an anecdote or a theory.

What the CDC-Kaiser ACE Study found reshaped how an entire generation of clinicians, counselors, and caregivers think about adult struggles. It didn't ask "why does this woman keep making bad choices." It asked a different, more useful question: what happened to her before she was old enough to have much choice in anything at all.

The 10 ACE categories

The original study measured exposure to 10 specific categories of adversity occurring before age 18. They fall into three broad groups — abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction:

• Physical abuse
• Sexual abuse
• Emotional abuse
• Physical neglect
• Emotional neglect
• Witnessing violence against a mother or parent
• Parental divorce or separation
• Living with a household member who had a substance use problem
• Living with a household member with mental illness
• Having a household member who was incarcerated

Read that list plainly, without flinching from it. These aren't rare, exotic circumstances. They're the ordinary architecture of a lot of childhoods — which is exactly why the research mattered. It gave a name and a number to something millions of women were already carrying quietly, often without any language for it.

What an ACE score is — and isn't

An ACE score is simply the count of how many of those 10 categories a person experienced growing up — a number from 0 to 10. The CDC-Kaiser research found a clear pattern across the study population: the higher the ACE score, the greater the average risk of a range of negative outcomes later in life — risky health behaviors, chronic health conditions, a lower reported quality of life, and an increased risk of outcomes like depression and, per the broader research base built on this original study, substance use disorder.

That's a statement about risk across a large population, not a prediction about any one woman. An ACE score is not a diagnosis. It doesn't tell you what will happen to a specific person — it tells you what tends to happen, on average, when a body and a developing brain absorb that much adversity before they're finished forming. Some people with high scores thrive. Some people with a score of zero still struggle enormously for other reasons. The score is a research tool, not a verdict.

"What happened to you," not "what's wrong with you"

This is the piece of the ACE research that matters most outside of academic circles, and it's worth sitting with directly. For a woman whose adult life includes addiction, a hard time trusting the people who love her, or a habit of repeating relationship patterns she swore she'd never repeat, the instinctive question — from others, and often from herself — is "what's wrong with me?"

ACEs research answers a different, truer question: what happened to you? A childhood spent absorbing one or more of those 10 categories doesn't excuse harmful adult choices, but it explains them in a way that "what's wrong with her" never could. A nervous system that learned early to expect danger, unpredictability, or abandonment doesn't stop protecting itself just because the person is now grown and the original threat is gone. The coping mechanisms that once kept a child safe — numbing out, staying hypervigilant, avoiding closeness, reaching for whatever made the pain stop — don't disappear on their own. They just keep running, often against the very life the woman is now trying to build.

Why this matters for recovery

This is exactly why trauma-informed care exists as a distinct approach rather than a slogan. A program that doesn't understand a woman's history will keep addressing the surface behavior — the addiction, the withdrawal, the distrust — without ever reaching what's underneath it, and will likely misread her responses as defiance or weakness rather than a nervous system doing exactly what it learned to do. Understanding ACEs doesn't mean excusing destructive behavior. It means treating the whole person, not just the presenting crisis, and building safety, trust, and real choice into recovery instead of more control — the same principles SAMHSA's trauma-informed framework describes in detail.

A woman recovering from addiction who also carries a high ACE score isn't fighting one battle. She's very often fighting the downstream consequences of a childhood she didn't choose, using tools an adult life didn't equip her to put down easily. Recovery that only targets the substance and ignores the history tends not to hold.

A history is not a sentence

None of this research exists to hand anyone a permanent label. The entire point of naming ACEs is the opposite — once a pattern has a name and a cause, it can be worked with instead of just endured. Understanding where a struggle came from is often the first moment a woman stops treating her own pain as evidence that she's broken beyond repair, and starts treating it as something with an origin, a shape, and — with the right support — a way through.

If any of this article sounds like your own story, or your daughter's, or your sister's, that recognition is not a diagnosis and it's not the end of anything. Mercy Manor's Get Help page is a place to start the conversation about what real support could look like next.

Common questions